JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel has suspended tax transfers to the Palestinians, its finance minister said on Sunday, fearing the money will be used to fund Hamas after President Mahmoud Abbas struck a unity deal with the Islamists.
The Palestinian Authority (PA), led by U.S.-backed Abbas, asked foreign powers to stop Israel from blocking the transfers, which make up 70 percent of its revenues. A senior Palestinian official said Israel, by its action, had "started a war."
Israeli Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz said he had suspended a routine handover of 300 million shekels ($88 million) in customs and other levies that Israel collects on behalf of the Palestinians under interim peace deals.
In an interview on Army Radio, Steinitz said Israel feared the money would go to fund Hamas, an Islamist militant group that runs the Gaza Strip and whose charter calls for the destruction of the Jewish state.
Israel had threatened sanctions last week in response to Abbas's surprise announcement of a unity deal with Hamas that envisages the formation of an interim government and elections later this year.
Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad said the PA was "in contact with all international influential forces and parties to stop Israel from taking these measures."
"Threats ... will not deter us from concluding our reconciliation process. It is our policy and we must work harder to end our divisions as soon as possible," added Fayyad.
The PA is also heavily dependent on aid from donors including the United States, which has said its future assistance will depend on the shape of a new Palestinian government, expected to be formed under the unity agreement.
Hassan Abu Libdeh, the Palestinian economy minister, told the Maan News Agency the PA would be unable to meet its commitments, including paying the salaries of its employees, if the transfers were blocked. The PA pays salaries to around 150,000 people in the West Bank and Gaza.
ISRAELI OPPOSITION
In public remarks to the Israeli cabinet, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reaffirmed his opposition to the unity pact and said the reconciliation should worry "all those throughout the world" who aspire to Middle East peace.
"Peace is possible only with those who want to live in peace with us, and not with those who seek to destroy us," said Netanyahu, who travels to Britain and France later this week for talks with their leaders.
Palestinian leaders have been invited by Egypt to Cairo for a three-day ceremony starting on Monday that will end with the signing of the unity agreement, Palestinian officials said.
Abbas spokesman Nabil Abu Rdainah said it could take up to six weeks to form a new government. He said it would be made up of independents with no connection to Abbas's Fatah movement or Hamas, and foreign states should have no reason to boycott it.
Hamas is shunned by the West over its refusal to recognize Israel, renounce violence and accept the interim peace accords.
U.S.-backed Israeli-Palestinian talks on a permanent peace agreement were revived in September but quickly fizzled after Netanyahu refused to extend a limited building moratorium in Jewish settlements in the West Bank, territory Palestinians want as part of a future state.
Abbas has said he would return to negotiations only if construction in settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, areas Israel captured in a 1967 war, was halted. Netanyahu has said that is an unacceptable precondition for talks.
The tax transfers provide the PA, which exercises limited self-rule in the West Bank, with $1 billion to $1.4 billion annually. Saeb Erekat, a senior Palestinian official, said that by withholding the money, "Israel has started a war even before the formation of the government."
Steinitz noted that Israel had held back tax revenues in the past, during a Palestinian uprising that began in 2000.
(Additional reporting by Ali Sawafta and Tom Perry in Ramallah, writing by Dan Williams and Ori Lewis; editing by Mark Trevelyan and Mark Heinrich)
Brian Brown on Twitter
Click my Face.
Read my Rants on Twitter
Tuesday, April 28, 2015
Saturday, April 25, 2015
Saturday, July 5, 2014
W is not looking so bad after all
Say what you want about on the corporate take, Scull & Bones, Iraq, TARP but it is glaring! George W. Bush was not that darned bad
Friday, July 4, 2014
Friday, June 13, 2014
Sunday, April 13, 2014
Bundy vs. Gestapo
This was via Steve Reichert https://www.facebook.com/SteveReichertOfficialPage
Text:
Not sure how true this is, however it does fit their past SOP:
From Doug Hagmann
At 1750 hours ET, I was contacted by my source within the Department of Homeland Security regarding the current situation at the Bundy Ranch. To put it bluntly, the people are being hoodwinked into believing that the situation is being resolved. It is not. It is a strategic de-escalation to fool the public. This source stated that the retreat of the BLM agents and the release of the cattle was actually crafted as a potential plan yesterday (Friday, 11 April 2014) based on the following:
1. A military assessment of satellite and drone surveillance imagery of the “patriot resistance. Drones under the control of the U.S. military were in use, taking real-time photographic images of not just the activity at the ranch, but "identifying the protesters, any arms and any supplies they might have or be carrying. “Mission accomplished.”
2. Real-time communication intercepts between patriots on-site and their off-site support;
3. Active monitoring of internet traffic regarding the coverage of events at ranch;
4. The monitoring of real-time video from the scene.
This source stated that a response by the patriot movement was anticipated, although exceeded their expectations. Although this was a real operation, they also ran this as a test case for future government operations once they saw the response. They were also actively managing the media, in some cases threatening to cut off White House access to anyone covering the event.
Despite this, the coverage by the alternative media began to create a public relations problem that was not easily managed. Note the lack of acknowledgment by the White House regarding this event. They are intentionally framing it as a state issue, despite the fact that all federal response has been and continues to be from the White House. There is a reason for this – a reason that has not been identified in any of the public reports to date. I will explain in further detail in a follow-up report on Sunday, after this source attends [redacted] to obtain more specific information about future federal operations. Regardless, according to this source, the government will take back ‘their land’ as they must to fulfill international obligations. It was never about grazing rights or anything other than (1) “securing clear title” to the land, and (2) further demonizing any patriotic resistance. It is my understanding, based on the information from this source, that it is a critical task to create a situation that will also advance their agenda of gun control and confiscation.
A more detailed report will follow on Sunday, 13 April 2014, with additional and much more specific information about their inside plans and future operations.PLEASE MAKE THIS VIRAL!
Text:
Not sure how true this is, however it does fit their past SOP:
From Doug Hagmann
At 1750 hours ET, I was contacted by my source within the Department of Homeland Security regarding the current situation at the Bundy Ranch. To put it bluntly, the people are being hoodwinked into believing that the situation is being resolved. It is not. It is a strategic de-escalation to fool the public. This source stated that the retreat of the BLM agents and the release of the cattle was actually crafted as a potential plan yesterday (Friday, 11 April 2014) based on the following:
1. A military assessment of satellite and drone surveillance imagery of the “patriot resistance. Drones under the control of the U.S. military were in use, taking real-time photographic images of not just the activity at the ranch, but "identifying the protesters, any arms and any supplies they might have or be carrying. “Mission accomplished.”
2. Real-time communication intercepts between patriots on-site and their off-site support;
3. Active monitoring of internet traffic regarding the coverage of events at ranch;
4. The monitoring of real-time video from the scene.
This source stated that a response by the patriot movement was anticipated, although exceeded their expectations. Although this was a real operation, they also ran this as a test case for future government operations once they saw the response. They were also actively managing the media, in some cases threatening to cut off White House access to anyone covering the event.
Despite this, the coverage by the alternative media began to create a public relations problem that was not easily managed. Note the lack of acknowledgment by the White House regarding this event. They are intentionally framing it as a state issue, despite the fact that all federal response has been and continues to be from the White House. There is a reason for this – a reason that has not been identified in any of the public reports to date. I will explain in further detail in a follow-up report on Sunday, after this source attends [redacted] to obtain more specific information about future federal operations. Regardless, according to this source, the government will take back ‘their land’ as they must to fulfill international obligations. It was never about grazing rights or anything other than (1) “securing clear title” to the land, and (2) further demonizing any patriotic resistance. It is my understanding, based on the information from this source, that it is a critical task to create a situation that will also advance their agenda of gun control and confiscation.
A more detailed report will follow on Sunday, 13 April 2014, with additional and much more specific information about their inside plans and future operations.PLEASE MAKE THIS VIRAL!
Sunday, January 19, 2014
Sunday, December 22, 2013
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
Sunday, December 8, 2013
Monday, May 27, 2013
Saturday, May 25, 2013
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Sunday, September 16, 2012
From the Tea Party on Facebook
Mitt Romney: Has never has had alcohol, Has never smoked pot, Has never taken illegal narcotics, Married to the same woman for over 40 years, Has 5 loving sons and several loving grandchildren, Believes in God and goes to church every Sunday (unlike Obama who never attends church in DC) and believes there are Muslim terrorists in the world who hate us and want us dead instead of apologizing to them. It's no wonder the left hates Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney is a good decent American who loves God, his family and his country
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
DIANNE FEINSTEIN ACCUSES GOP OF WAR AGAINST WOMEN
What does she really stand for?!
The Constitution Baby!
Has your teenager wrecked your car and blamed someone else?
You've asked your teenage son if he follows the law, he may borrow your car.
Cotati medical pot club wants city to lift customer limit
"A Cotati California medical marijuana dispensary is asking the city to lift customer caps that were put in place when it opened in 2010."
Perhaps the city should allow the dispensary to remain open but set the cap to 0. :-/
Did you notice how the reference is to "customers" vs "patients"?
Monday, March 12, 2012
They have the nerve to pick on Rush Limbaugh?!
Hypocrisy Hypocrisy Hypocrisy Hypocrisy Hypocrisy Hypocrisy Hypocrisy Hypocrisy
Two-faced liberal
Sunday, January 15, 2012
THIS IS DISTURBING!!
If you two hate this country so much then get the hell out!!
Yes, folks, that is what she said, according to an instructor at a School for the Deaf and Blind who watched the video. The video is shown at normal speed, 3/4 speed, and 1/2 speed with no banners obstructing her lips.
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
POTUS Prompter once again
I figured I wouldn't write anything. Just enjoy another picture of your Tele-President:
Thursday, December 22, 2011
Having more than 7 days of food makes you a terrorist? REALLY?!!
WELCOME TO THE U.S.S.R. !
DOJ & Homeland are having serious discussions about red-flagging you if you purchase more than 7 days of food such as rice, grains, cooking oil, and salt. Gun ammunition is at the top of the list too. Even states are getting on board. There currently is a discussion in Sacramento, CA on this very issue. Neat!
In fact, the wording in my comments here could draw interest.
What do you think? Is this the America you remember? Is this the America you want? I'll say it in three words: "Kim Jong il"
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
Oh! No no no no!!!
These poor misguided people
Kim Jong Il - Presidents must have supporters NOT followers.
This is so unhealthy.
This is so unhealthy.
Unhealthy attachment at large.
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
SMART Train. Dumb idea
Wasteful spending in California. What else is new? The SMART Train project will be a national embarrassment. Help back Repeal-SMART and derail this pet project: http://www.watchsonomacounty.com/2011/12/transportation/repeal-smart-forces-halfway-to-petition-goal/ ◄-Chime in
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Federal Reserve Interview
England, Japan, Switzerland and Canada ease swapping
FED RESERVE INTERVIEW
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
How bad does it have to get?
It is interesting how folks go about their daily lives complacent and confident that there is nothing wrong. The average Joe and Josephine are reactive but not proactive. We put more interest in which DRIOD or iPhone will be on the market next week than what’s going on in D.C. If I said the word “Winning!” you would know exactly who I am referring to. However if I said “Corpsman” with the ‘ps’ pronounced, you would have no idea who I am talking about. Who said this, “I mean …I do think at a certain point you've made enough money.”? That’s a pretty serious comment. Who said it?
Some of us (me included) sit on the edge of my chair watching and predicting whose going to be drafted into my favorite team, who was traded, etc. But do we sit on the edge of our seat and track what’s happening on the floor of the House? Probably not.
Don’t ever doubt that what is going on there has no effect on you personally, either now or down the road. What’s worse we’re not paying close attention to the “chain of command” over you.
...here, let’s see…
Government and Homeowner's Associations not that different
Government... local and federal:
Government is a service to the citizens. It was created by and for the citizens “in order to form a more perfect union”.
Try to remember this everyday as you go about the business of being an American.
Government is no more than a property manager or homeowner’s association. Think about it this way: A homeowner’s association in a gated community (The United States of America) is to insure that the residence (citizens) are protected from uninvited guests (illegal entry). In order for the guest to gain access to the property they must use the call box and get permission to enter from the resident (INS, Customs, and an immigration sponsor). Most gated communities have security to patrol the neighborhood (U.S. Armed Forces).
The homeowner’s association sets up the rules an ordinances voted in by the residence (ballot measures, propositions, etc.) The homeowner’s association always has residence representation, a person who volunteers to represent the wishes of their neighbors (Congress / Senate). Homeowner’s associations have presidents and vice presidents, treasures, and secretaries. (Executive Branch)
The homeowner’s association has been given responsibility of arranging for property maintenance and repairs (Infrastructure, roads, highways, and parks).
Your local City government is nearly the same, less the gated access service. Watch them closely.
In all cases your property management fees (taxes) must be spent wisely with focus on security, rules, and maintenance. (Military & Police, Laws & Constitution, and infrastructure maintenance and repair) In fact, infrastructure maintenance and repair really is a local issue and is not in the Constitution.
In a nutshell:
Government! Secure the perimeter, trim the hedges, and listen and heed the residents (citizens). Otherwise butt out!
Get it?!
Government is a service to the citizens. It was created by and for the citizens “in order to form a more perfect union”.
Try to remember this everyday as you go about the business of being an American.
Government is no more than a property manager or homeowner’s association. Think about it this way: A homeowner’s association in a gated community (The United States of America) is to insure that the residence (citizens) are protected from uninvited guests (illegal entry). In order for the guest to gain access to the property they must use the call box and get permission to enter from the resident (INS, Customs, and an immigration sponsor). Most gated communities have security to patrol the neighborhood (U.S. Armed Forces).
The homeowner’s association sets up the rules an ordinances voted in by the residence (ballot measures, propositions, etc.) The homeowner’s association always has residence representation, a person who volunteers to represent the wishes of their neighbors (Congress / Senate). Homeowner’s associations have presidents and vice presidents, treasures, and secretaries. (Executive Branch)
The homeowner’s association has been given responsibility of arranging for property maintenance and repairs (Infrastructure, roads, highways, and parks).
Your local City government is nearly the same, less the gated access service. Watch them closely.
In all cases your property management fees (taxes) must be spent wisely with focus on security, rules, and maintenance. (Military & Police, Laws & Constitution, and infrastructure maintenance and repair) In fact, infrastructure maintenance and repair really is a local issue and is not in the Constitution.
In a nutshell:
Government! Secure the perimeter, trim the hedges, and listen and heed the residents (citizens). Otherwise butt out!
Get it?!
Sunday, May 1, 2011
Engage and convert
The Winged Beast
In order to understand the playing field between conservatives and liberals it is important to dissect the interworking of the liberal platform.
Here’s my casual observation.
There is a core platform in the liberal phenomena that may have started as far back as Woodrow Wilson. Over time the liberal structure developed two wings. One wing is the tactical group while the other is the marketing group.
The tactical group assumed the function of manipulating the territory to fit their best interests. This included creating and holding district lines that kept the conservative voice in check. Other strategies include employing legislative loopholes contrary to the Constitution and earmark funding to sway the votes in their favor.
Meanwhile the marketing arm of the liberal movement took positions in major media outlets, formed community organizations with persuasive leaders, and sought disenfranchised and poor Americans to cultivate.
The tactical arm and the marketing arm came together to ally with powerful unions. The liberal movement, utilizing the unions as one of its bountiful hosts, was able to leverage the money and power by the union organization itself, while cultivating sympathy with its members.
The tactic and marketing model of the liberal movement originally happened almost by accident. But when they came to realize they were gaining ground, they became organized and powerful. Capitalizing on the codependent nature of their relationship, they were able to keep the message of dependence and suffering alive. Not unlike the ant and the aphid that yields a honey-like substance on which the ants feed.
“Winning!”
Now is the time to recast the dichotomy of left and right. If it cannot be seen as a competitive setting, the conservative will continue to do its Rumpelstiltskin routine. The yelling and vitriol that makes us look powerless and repugnant will have to stop. It is time to take a mature, strategic position. We will have display our sophistication and calm. When confronted with severe opposition and baseless ideology, restraint and calm is the order of the day. Listen and show interest in your subject as he or she espouses their liberal wisdom. Show interest. Do not stand in front of them. Stand beside them to reduce the sense of confrontation. Be courteous and kind. Smile. Breathe.
After the liberal bloviating has finished, invite them to hear you out and ask their opinion along the way. Remain firm and respectful. Remain calm. Invite them to visit with other conservative folks. Preplan this meeting and make sure that the conservative members are on board. This may require a few anger management courses but the benefits could be robust.
Behind the Scenes
Start a sub-marketing campaign that showcases the falsehoods and spin of the left while keeping yourself insulated from the ‘anonymous’ publisher. Make sure you are relentless in showcasing the lies and spin of the left while never revealing the source (you).
When the liberal complains either face-to-face or by blog, respond with empathy as you ask your subject why the publisher took such a position. Allow them to go through their repeated and tired talking points. Don’t get mad and respond. Ask them if it would be ok to team up and investigate the accusation of falsehoods. Make the playing field feel level.
Work it!
My son told me over dinner the other night that if the liberal mind has pure dislike and contempt for the Tea Party, then change the name of the Tea Party and continue the work as he cited the name change from ‘liberal’ to ‘progressive’. (a 17 year old)
Create new organization names that portray something pleasant such as relating the term CRUSH to the wine country.
Create the pyramid
Do you want it or don’t you? Conservatives often take the starving musician’s mentality. “We are what we are and you are wrong”. How can one change another’s mind if they are not allowed to at least take a peek at the offering? It will be impossible to engage, convert, and indoctrinate if they are dragged kicking and screaming to conservatism.
Create the conservative pyramid that allows a place to get on. Your work to convert can start later. A conservative pyramid could look like this: Michael Savage and Rush Limbaugh position 1, Sean Hanity, Glenn Beck position 2, Bill O’Reilly and Britt Hume position 3, George Stephanopoulos and John Stossel position 4, Geraldo Rivera and Joe Scarborough position 5. And so on. (perhaps a bad example but you get the idea)
The key is engagement. Without it the definition of insanity will prevail ~ Albert Einstein once said "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results".
In order to understand the playing field between conservatives and liberals it is important to dissect the interworking of the liberal platform.
Here’s my casual observation.
There is a core platform in the liberal phenomena that may have started as far back as Woodrow Wilson. Over time the liberal structure developed two wings. One wing is the tactical group while the other is the marketing group.
The tactical group assumed the function of manipulating the territory to fit their best interests. This included creating and holding district lines that kept the conservative voice in check. Other strategies include employing legislative loopholes contrary to the Constitution and earmark funding to sway the votes in their favor.
Meanwhile the marketing arm of the liberal movement took positions in major media outlets, formed community organizations with persuasive leaders, and sought disenfranchised and poor Americans to cultivate.
The tactical arm and the marketing arm came together to ally with powerful unions. The liberal movement, utilizing the unions as one of its bountiful hosts, was able to leverage the money and power by the union organization itself, while cultivating sympathy with its members.
The tactic and marketing model of the liberal movement originally happened almost by accident. But when they came to realize they were gaining ground, they became organized and powerful. Capitalizing on the codependent nature of their relationship, they were able to keep the message of dependence and suffering alive. Not unlike the ant and the aphid that yields a honey-like substance on which the ants feed.
“Winning!”
Now is the time to recast the dichotomy of left and right. If it cannot be seen as a competitive setting, the conservative will continue to do its Rumpelstiltskin routine. The yelling and vitriol that makes us look powerless and repugnant will have to stop. It is time to take a mature, strategic position. We will have display our sophistication and calm. When confronted with severe opposition and baseless ideology, restraint and calm is the order of the day. Listen and show interest in your subject as he or she espouses their liberal wisdom. Show interest. Do not stand in front of them. Stand beside them to reduce the sense of confrontation. Be courteous and kind. Smile. Breathe.
After the liberal bloviating has finished, invite them to hear you out and ask their opinion along the way. Remain firm and respectful. Remain calm. Invite them to visit with other conservative folks. Preplan this meeting and make sure that the conservative members are on board. This may require a few anger management courses but the benefits could be robust.
Behind the Scenes
Start a sub-marketing campaign that showcases the falsehoods and spin of the left while keeping yourself insulated from the ‘anonymous’ publisher. Make sure you are relentless in showcasing the lies and spin of the left while never revealing the source (you).
When the liberal complains either face-to-face or by blog, respond with empathy as you ask your subject why the publisher took such a position. Allow them to go through their repeated and tired talking points. Don’t get mad and respond. Ask them if it would be ok to team up and investigate the accusation of falsehoods. Make the playing field feel level.
Work it!
My son told me over dinner the other night that if the liberal mind has pure dislike and contempt for the Tea Party, then change the name of the Tea Party and continue the work as he cited the name change from ‘liberal’ to ‘progressive’. (a 17 year old)
Create new organization names that portray something pleasant such as relating the term CRUSH to the wine country.
Create the pyramid
Do you want it or don’t you? Conservatives often take the starving musician’s mentality. “We are what we are and you are wrong”. How can one change another’s mind if they are not allowed to at least take a peek at the offering? It will be impossible to engage, convert, and indoctrinate if they are dragged kicking and screaming to conservatism.
Create the conservative pyramid that allows a place to get on. Your work to convert can start later. A conservative pyramid could look like this: Michael Savage and Rush Limbaugh position 1, Sean Hanity, Glenn Beck position 2, Bill O’Reilly and Britt Hume position 3, George Stephanopoulos and John Stossel position 4, Geraldo Rivera and Joe Scarborough position 5. And so on. (perhaps a bad example but you get the idea)
The key is engagement. Without it the definition of insanity will prevail ~ Albert Einstein once said "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results".
Israel turns off the tap
Israel halts cash to Palestinians after Hamas deal
Ori Lewis
Reuters US Online Report Top News
Reuters US Online Report Top News
May 01, 2011 12:14 EDT
China army warns over Ai Weiwei image in Hong Kong
China's army has warned that an image of detained artist Ai Weiwei, briefly projected onto a Hong Kong barracks amid a campaign in the territory for his release, was illegal, a report said on Saturday.
An artist calling himself Cpak Ming displayed an image of the dissident's face with the words "Who's Afraid of Ai Weiwei?" on the barracks, police headquarters and other buildings this week, the South China Morning Post said.
A spokesman for the Hong Kong garrison of the People's Liberation Army told the newspaper: "No one can paint or project pictures and images onto the outer wall of the barracks without the garrison's permission.
"Such an offence is a breach of Hong Kong law. The PLA reserves its legal rights."
Residents of the semi-autonomous south China territory generally enjoy civil liberties not seen on the mainland, including freedom of speech, under the "one country, two systems" principle in place since Britain handed the city back to Beijing.
More than 1,000 people took part in a protest march a week ago demanding the release of Ai, who was detained in early April in Beijing for unspecified "economic crimes", sparking worldwide condemnation.
Supporters say the detention of the outspoken critic of China's Communist Party leaders is political and forms part of a crackdown on dissidents in recent weeks, under which scores of lawyers and campaigners have been held.
A rash of stencilled, painted graffiti in Ai's support has also appeared on the streets of the financial hub this month and is under investigation by police as a possible case of criminal damage, the Post reported.
The man responsible for the "flash graffiti" projections of Ai could not be contacted via his Facebook page, the newspaper said.
He has uploaded instructions to the social networking site so that Ai supporters could create their own displays.
Legislator Ronny Tong Kun-sun, a barrister, said he could not see that the projections broke the law.
"He is just expressing his opinion in a very short period of time and poses no permanent damage to the building," he told the paper.
The PLA -- the world's largest military force -- established bases in Hong Kong in 1997 when the territory ceased to be a British colony.
A spokesman for the Hong Kong garrison of the People's Liberation Army told the newspaper: "No one can paint or project pictures and images onto the outer wall of the barracks without the garrison's permission.
"Such an offence is a breach of Hong Kong law. The PLA reserves its legal rights."
Residents of the semi-autonomous south China territory generally enjoy civil liberties not seen on the mainland, including freedom of speech, under the "one country, two systems" principle in place since Britain handed the city back to Beijing.
More than 1,000 people took part in a protest march a week ago demanding the release of Ai, who was detained in early April in Beijing for unspecified "economic crimes", sparking worldwide condemnation.
Supporters say the detention of the outspoken critic of China's Communist Party leaders is political and forms part of a crackdown on dissidents in recent weeks, under which scores of lawyers and campaigners have been held.
A rash of stencilled, painted graffiti in Ai's support has also appeared on the streets of the financial hub this month and is under investigation by police as a possible case of criminal damage, the Post reported.
The man responsible for the "flash graffiti" projections of Ai could not be contacted via his Facebook page, the newspaper said.
He has uploaded instructions to the social networking site so that Ai supporters could create their own displays.
Legislator Ronny Tong Kun-sun, a barrister, said he could not see that the projections broke the law.
"He is just expressing his opinion in a very short period of time and poses no permanent damage to the building," he told the paper.
The PLA -- the world's largest military force -- established bases in Hong Kong in 1997 when the territory ceased to be a British colony.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)